This study investigates the effectiveness of a hybrid decision-support framework that integrates a Hybrid Genetic Algorithm (HGA) with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to identify optimal investment portfolios in the Amman Stock Exchange (ASE). Using daily stock return data for companies listed on the ASE over the period January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, the HGA is employed to generate and evolve 10,000 candidate portfolios, each consisting of six stocks. The generated portfolios are evaluated based on the risk–return trade-off, and the efficient frontier is constructed. Subsequently, the AHP is applied to rank the efficient portfolios according to seven evaluation criteria: expected return, risk, beta, liquidity, Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio, and Jensen’s alpha. The results demonstrate that the proposed HGA–AHP framework effectively identifies portfolios located on the efficient frontier and selects an optimal portfolio that exhibits superior risk-adjusted performance relative to the market benchmark. The hybrid approach successfully addresses nonlinear constraints and discrete asset selection issues that limit traditional optimization techniques. This study contributes empirical evidence from an emerging market and provides a replicable hybrid portfolio optimization framework for investors, portfolio managers, and financial institutions.
| Published in | Innovation Business (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ib.20260101.14 |
| Page(s) | 37-54 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Hybrid Genetic Algorithm, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Portfolio Optimization, Efficient Frontier, Amman Stock Exchange, Investment Decision-making
| [1] | Brown, K. C. and Reilly, F. K. (2008), Analysis of Investments and Management of Portfolios, 9th ed., McGraw-Hill/Irwin. |
| [2] | Chyi, L. L., Robinson, J. and Reed, R. (2008), “Downside Beta and the Cross-Sectional Determinants of Listed Property Trust Returns”, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 49–62. |
| [3] | De Bondt, W. F. M. and Thaler, R. (1985), “Does the Stock Market Overreact?”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 793–805. |
| [4] | Fama, E. F. (1970), “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 383–417. |
| [5] | Fama, E. F. (1991), “Efficient Capital Markets II”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 1575–1617. |
| [6] | Haugen, R. A. (2001), Modern Investment Theory, 5th ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey. |
| [7] | Isiklar, G. and Büyüközkan, G. (2007), “Using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate Mobile Phone Alternatives”, Computer Standards & Interfaces, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 265–274. |
| [8] | Jensen, M. C. (1968), “The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945–1964”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 389–416. |
| [9] | Levinson, M. (2006), Guide to Financial Markets, Profile Books, London. |
| [10] | Lintner, J. (1965), “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 13–37. |
| [11] | Maginn, J. L., Tuttle, D. L., McLeavey, D. W. and Pinto, J. E. (1990), Managing Investment Portfolios: A Dynamic Process, 2nd ed., Warren, Gorham & Lamont. |
| [12] | Markowitz, H. M. (1952), “Portfolio Selection”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 77–91. |
| [13] | Markowitz, H. (1959), Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, Basil Blackwell, New York. |
| [14] | Markowitz, H. M. (1991), “Foundations of Portfolio Theory”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 469–477. |
| [15] | Mossin, J. (1966), “Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market”, Econometrica, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 768–783. |
| [16] | Papahristodoulou, C. and Dotzauer, E. (2004), “Optimal Portfolios Using Linear Programming Models”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 55, No. 11, pp. 1169–1177. |
| [17] | Pappas, D., Kiriakopoulos, K. and Kaimakamis, G. (2010), “Optimal Portfolio Selection with Singular Covariance Matrix”, International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 5, No. 47, pp. 2305–2318. |
| [18] | Peavy, J. (1990), Cases in Portfolio Management, Association for Investment Management and Research, Charlottesville, VA. |
| [19] | Roll, R. (1977), “A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory’s Tests: Part I”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 129–176. |
| [20] | Roll, R. (1978), “Ambiguity When Performance Is Measured by the Security Market Line”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 1051–1069. |
| [21] | Ross, S. A. (1976), “The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing”, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 341–360. |
| [22] | Sahu, R., Jain, M. and Garg, G. (2006), “Optimal Portfolio Allocation Using Portfolio Theory and Heuristics Driven Evolutionary Technique”, Journal of Advances in Management Research, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 81–87. |
| [23] | Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York. |
| [24] | Saaty, R. W. (1987), “The Analytic Hierarchy Process—What It Is and How It Is Used”, Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 9, No. 3–5, pp. 161–176. |
| [25] | Sharpe, W. F. (1964), “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 425–442. |
| [26] | Sharpe, W. F. (1966), “Mutual Fund Performance”, The Journal of Business, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 119–138. |
| [27] | Solimanpur, M., Mansourfar, G. and Ghayour, F. (2015), “Optimum Portfolio Selection Using a Hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Studies in Economics and Finance, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 379–394. |
| [28] | Taleb, N. N. (2007), “Black Swans and the Domains of Statistics”, The American Statistician, Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 198–200. |
| [29] | Treynor, J. L. (1965), “How to Rate Management of Investment Funds”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 63–75. |
| [30] | Vargas, L. G. (1990), “An Overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Applications”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 2–8. |
| [31] | Amman Stock Exchange (ASE), available at: |
| [32] | Jordan Securities Commission (JSC), available at: |
| [33] | Securities Depository Center (SDC), available at: |
APA Style
Hallaq, S. S. A., Ajlouni, M., Ghazalt, A., Al-Saadi, M. (2026). A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm–analytic Hierarchy Process Approach to Optimal Portfolio Selection: Evidence from the Amman Stock Exchange. Innovation Business, 1(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ib.20260101.14
ACS Style
Hallaq, S. S. A.; Ajlouni, M.; Ghazalt, A.; Al-Saadi, M. A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm–analytic Hierarchy Process Approach to Optimal Portfolio Selection: Evidence from the Amman Stock Exchange. Innov. Bus. 2026, 1(1), 37-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ib.20260101.14
AMA Style
Hallaq SSA, Ajlouni M, Ghazalt A, Al-Saadi M. A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm–analytic Hierarchy Process Approach to Optimal Portfolio Selection: Evidence from the Amman Stock Exchange. Innov Bus. 2026;1(1):37-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ib.20260101.14
@article{10.11648/j.ib.20260101.14,
author = {Said Sami Al Hallaq and Mohammad Ajlouni and Anas Ghazalt and Mahmoud Al-Saadi},
title = {A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm–analytic Hierarchy Process Approach to Optimal Portfolio Selection: Evidence from the Amman Stock Exchange},
journal = {Innovation Business},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {37-54},
doi = {10.11648/j.ib.20260101.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ib.20260101.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ib.20260101.14},
abstract = {This study investigates the effectiveness of a hybrid decision-support framework that integrates a Hybrid Genetic Algorithm (HGA) with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to identify optimal investment portfolios in the Amman Stock Exchange (ASE). Using daily stock return data for companies listed on the ASE over the period January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, the HGA is employed to generate and evolve 10,000 candidate portfolios, each consisting of six stocks. The generated portfolios are evaluated based on the risk–return trade-off, and the efficient frontier is constructed. Subsequently, the AHP is applied to rank the efficient portfolios according to seven evaluation criteria: expected return, risk, beta, liquidity, Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio, and Jensen’s alpha. The results demonstrate that the proposed HGA–AHP framework effectively identifies portfolios located on the efficient frontier and selects an optimal portfolio that exhibits superior risk-adjusted performance relative to the market benchmark. The hybrid approach successfully addresses nonlinear constraints and discrete asset selection issues that limit traditional optimization techniques. This study contributes empirical evidence from an emerging market and provides a replicable hybrid portfolio optimization framework for investors, portfolio managers, and financial institutions.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm–analytic Hierarchy Process Approach to Optimal Portfolio Selection: Evidence from the Amman Stock Exchange AU - Said Sami Al Hallaq AU - Mohammad Ajlouni AU - Anas Ghazalt AU - Mahmoud Al-Saadi Y1 - 2026/02/24 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ib.20260101.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ib.20260101.14 T2 - Innovation Business JF - Innovation Business JO - Innovation Business SP - 37 EP - 54 PB - Science Publishing Group UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ib.20260101.14 AB - This study investigates the effectiveness of a hybrid decision-support framework that integrates a Hybrid Genetic Algorithm (HGA) with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to identify optimal investment portfolios in the Amman Stock Exchange (ASE). Using daily stock return data for companies listed on the ASE over the period January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, the HGA is employed to generate and evolve 10,000 candidate portfolios, each consisting of six stocks. The generated portfolios are evaluated based on the risk–return trade-off, and the efficient frontier is constructed. Subsequently, the AHP is applied to rank the efficient portfolios according to seven evaluation criteria: expected return, risk, beta, liquidity, Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio, and Jensen’s alpha. The results demonstrate that the proposed HGA–AHP framework effectively identifies portfolios located on the efficient frontier and selects an optimal portfolio that exhibits superior risk-adjusted performance relative to the market benchmark. The hybrid approach successfully addresses nonlinear constraints and discrete asset selection issues that limit traditional optimization techniques. This study contributes empirical evidence from an emerging market and provides a replicable hybrid portfolio optimization framework for investors, portfolio managers, and financial institutions. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -